Original Article

Vol. 27 No. 2 (2016): Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology

Evaluation of endoscopic findings for discriminating between early carcinomas and low-grade adenomas in superficial elevated gastric lesions

Main Article Content

Takashi Nonaka
Masahiko Inamori
Kenji Kanoshima
Kanji Ohkuma
Yumi Inoh
Mizue Matsuura
Akiko Fuyuki
Shiori Uchiyama
Takuma Higurashi
Hidenori Ohkubo
Hiroshi Iida
Hiroki Endo
Yoko Tateishi
Akihiko Kusakabe
Kenichi Ohashi
Shin Maeda
Atsushi Nakajima

Abstract

Abstract Background/Aims: This study aimed to determine the useful endoscopic findings in a differential diagnosis between early carcinomas (EC) and low-grade adenomas (LGA) in superficial elevated gastric epithelial neoplasia during conventional endoscopy with white-light imaging (C-WLI). Materials and Methods: We investigated 270 consecutive cases of superficial elevated gastric epithelial neoplasias, which were removed by endoscopic submucosal dissection. The pathological diagnostic criteria were based on the revised Vienna classification: category 4 (mucosal high-grade neoplasia) or 5 (submucosal invasion by carcinoma) lesions were diagnosed as EC, while category 3 (mucosal low-grade neoplasia) lesions were diagnosed as LGA. The association between the postoperative pathological diagnoses (EC or LGA) and the following endoscopic findings: localized site, lesion size, color (reddish or whitish), shape (smooth, petal, or irregular), and presences of depression, erosion, ulceration, or nodularity on the surface, were evaluated. Results: Of 270 epithelial neoplasias, 222 (58 LGA and 164 EC) were retrospectively evaluated. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the lesion size [odds ratio (OR), 1.216; p<0.001) and reddish color (OR, 5.274; p<0.001) were independent findings for EC. Conclusion: The lesion size and reddish color were useful optical findings for discriminating between EC and LGA.

Article Details

Most read articles by the same author(s)